Stratigraphic Units

Prev Next

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Pottery Medium
Geologic
Tufo Rare
Organic
Animal Bones Rare

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Relationships

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2016-07-17 J Troy Samuels

Layer of accumulation.

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Bag # Cassetta # Recovery Method # of Specimens Weight (gr) Notes
1845 119 Excavation 0 191
Totals 0 191

Faunal NISP

Species NISP NISP % NISP Notes
0 0
Totals 0

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Class Count Weight (kg) Details
Bone 0.24
CBM 2 0.58 Two pieces (one large, one quite small) that may be refractory bricks (bluish/red-orange) made for lining an area with constant firing (Cha).
Stone 2 0.017 Possible worked. Two pebbles (one quite small, the other larger but broken). Lithics?
Wattle and Daub 0.1
Worked Stone 2 2.14 Possible chunks of worked tufo. Not retained but discarded.
Totals 6 3.077
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

1786
Loom Weight, loom weight

1789
Metal Fragment, bronze fragment

1791
Metal Object, bronze pin

1792
Spool, Spool fragment

1794
Spool, spool

1803
Ring, Bronze ring fragment.

1804
Spool, spool

1805
Pin, Bronze pin fragment

1807
Metal Fragment, bronze fragment

1866
Spool, Spool fragment

1875
Metal Fragment, Bronze ring fragment

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics
Class Whole Vessels Rims Handles Bases Walls Total Weight (kg) Minimum Size (cm) Maximum Size (cm) Details
Bucchero 3 2 0.008 2 4
Bucchero Impasto 15 5 3 64 87 0.34 2 4
CBM 1 4 5 1.32 4 11
Commonware 3 1 5 8 0.073 2 5 Difficult to distinguish from impasto/impasto rosso
Commonware 1 14 15 0.09
Cooking Stand 2 2 5 0.26 6 6
Etrusco-Corinthian 1 1 0.02 7 7 Yellow-greenish fabric with black or dark brown stripe just below the rim. Uncertain identification.
Fineware 4 4 0.019 2 3 2 walls join. Impasto fabric, but with beige, finely burnished surface.
Impasto 31 6 4 483 524 6.3 3 10
Impasto Chiaro Sabbioso 3 3 0.05 4 4
Impasto Rosso 4 2 67 60 0.108 2 8
Large Storage Container 4 50 54 3.84 3 11
Painted Creamware 4 4 0.012 2 5 Banded creamware
White on Red 1 1 0.006 3 3 Two stripes of white
Totals 0 61 14 8 704 773 12.446

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

4219
500 BC - 400 BC

Connected Forms

Attachments

Attachments
PM1375_SU2558_extended.pdf
Photo Model

Grey silty deposit located in the N half of the courtyard with associated cut

SU_2558.JPG
Photo

GPR_2558_sketch.pdf
Sketch

Developed by the Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies, University of Arkansas.