Stratigraphic Units

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Pottery Frequent
Tiles Rare
Geologic
Tufo One red tufo rock
Organic
Animal Bones Frequent
Animal Teeth Frequent
Charcoal Frequent

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2014-07-23 Alexandra Creola

This is a deposit of an unknown, white-grey substance. Its original limits are also unknown because it may have been truncated by the backhoe, makng it difficult to understand its original shape. The depth is irregular. A sample was sent to Laura Motta for further analysis. We excavated this layer after it had been exposed to the sun for several weeks and at ths point it was quite dry and covered our hands with a white, powdery film when we touched it. Initial theories when it was first exposed and was slightly wetter include: degraded tufo and possibly a natural lime-calcium deposit.

2014-07-23 Alexandra Creola

Update: More of the white-grey material from this SU was found in non-discript, blotchy patces several inches down into SU 5581 (below SU 5605). This suggests that SU 5605 may originally have been a non-discript shape and may have only appeared to be linear because of the backhoe excavation.

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Bag # Cassetta # Recovery Method # of Specimens Weight (gr) Notes
1599 106 0 203
Totals 0 203

Faunal NISP

Species NISP NISP % NISP Notes
0 0
Totals 0

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Class Count Weight (kg) Details
Bone 0.205
Totals 0 0.205
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics
Class Whole Vessels Rims Handles Bases Walls Total Weight (kg) Minimum Size (cm) Maximum Size (cm) Details
Black Gloss 2 1 1 4 0.217 3 10
Commonware 1 7 2 22 32 0.608 3 8
Creamware 3 3 0.018 3 4
Fineware 1 1 0.002 2 2
Totals 3 7 2 1 27 40 0.845

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

280 BC - 200 BC

320 BC - 290 BC

300 BC - 50 BC

320 BC - 290 BC

Connected Forms

Botany
528

Attachments

Attachments
SU5605_PHM736_extended.pdf
Photo Model

White linear feature along bedrock

SU_5605_sketch.pdf
Sketch

SU_5605_1.JPG
Photo

SU_5605_2.JPG
Photo

SU_5605_3.JPG
Photo

SU_5605_4.JPG
Photo

SU_5605_5.JPG
Photo

SU_5605_6.JPG
Photo

SU_5605_7.JPG
Photo

SU5605_CER_33.pdf
Drawing

SU5605_CER_34.pdf
Drawing

SU5605_CER_35.pdf
Drawing