Stratigraphic Units

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Geologic
Organic

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2014-07-29 Andrew Johnston

Southern stretch of the western wall of this room, the eastern wall of which (between slab floors 5661 and 5662) has been robbed. The northern limit of this room was formed by 5545. THe southern limit of the room, an E-W wall in ashlar blocks which would have intersected with this wall at its southern end and would have run alongside slab floors 5739 and 5595, seems to have been robbed, leaving on the trace of its compact soil foundation (5780). The truncation at the northern limit has been revealed to be related to the construction of later brick arch feature 5757.

2014-07-17 Sara Shockley

This wall was likely taller than one block. The presence of plaster still attached indicates a facing covered the wall. The break at the northern limit was most likely not the result of robbery activity, because the missing section is not a complete block. The gap between 5665 and 5664 does not seem wide enough to have been a deliberate break, especially considering the uneven edge of the northern limit of 5665.

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Faunal NISP

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

Connected Forms

Attachments

Attachments
PHM907_SU5757_SU5758_SU5759_SU5664_SU5665_extended.pdf
Photo Model

Brick arch between 5664 and 5665 (5757), Broken-tufo slab and small rock below 5757 (5758), Rectangular cut in bedrock into slab floor 5726 (5759), and nearby walls 5664 and 5665

SU_5665_sketch.pdf
Sketch

SU_5665_1.JPG
Photo

SU_5665_2.JPG
Photo