Stratigraphic Units

Prev Next

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Pottery Medium
Tiles Frequent
Geologic
Tufo Medium Grey
Organic
Animal Bones Medium

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Relationships

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2015-07-18 J Troy Samuels

Deposit of colluvial soil likely felling a truncation in the stratigraphy due to later activity that also truncated walls 2276 and 2260 along their South. limit. SU clearly continues East and West into excavation limit and SU 2423 which is more of the same deposit.

2015-07-17 Arianna Zapelloni Pavia

grey deposit filling truncation from later activity

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Bag # Cassetta # Recovery Method # of Specimens Weight (gr) Notes
1628 108 0 140
Totals 0 140

Faunal NISP

Species NISP NISP % NISP Notes
0 0
Totals 0

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Class Count Weight (kg) Details
Bone 0.14
Totals 0 0.14
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

1651
Figurine, Female Figurine fragment

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics
Class Whole Vessels Rims Handles Bases Walls Total Weight (kg) Minimum Size (cm) Maximum Size (cm) Details
3 1 4 0.0168 3 4
Amphora 2 2 0.0484 6 6
Black Gloss 6 3 2 9 20 0.124 2 8 2 rim pieces join. Different qualities of black gloss.
Bucchero 3 1 1 7 12 0.0785 2 7
Commonware 26 2 75 103 1.224 3 10
Cooking Stand 2 2 0.094 6 7
Creamware 1 12 13 0.01 2 4
Dolium 4 4 0.305 5 9 Largest body sherd features deeply incised decoration of short scores/lines
Etrusco-Corinthian 1 1 0.0232 7 7
Imbrex 5 10 15 1.04 4 11 Kept diagnostics and fabric examples.
Impasto 5 2 7 92 106 1.704 2 6
Impasto Chiaro Sabbioso 2 8 10 20 0.0712 3 6 5 base pieces join and should be associated with another base fragment and at least three body sherds. One body sherd features some horizontal red paint (decoration ?)
Impasto Rosso 11 7 43 61 1.09 2 10
Internal Slip Ware 1 8 9 0.0844 3 6 6 body sherds feature a pale slip on both the interior and exterior
Italo Geometric 1 1 0.006 4 4
Large Storage Container 5 5 0.576 4 11
Opaque Red Ware 1 4 5 0.036 3 6
Overpainted Black Gloss 3 2 5 0.023 3 6
Painted Commonware 1 1 0.0176 4 4
Painted Creamware 1 1 0.012 5 5
Tegula 9 13 22 4.68 6 1 Kept only diagnostics.
Thin Walled 1 1 2 0.0039 3 4
Tile 1.405
Totals 0 76 8 35 295 414 12.673

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

3744
200 BC - 100 BC

3745
800 BC - 500 BC

3746
674 BC - 450 BC

3747
150 BC - 50 BC

3748
-

3749
170 BC - 130 BC

4127
400 BC - 200 BC

4131
360 BC - 330 BC

Connected Forms

Features
125

Attachments

Attachments
SU_2415_sketch.pdf
Sketch

GPR_2415_1.JPG
Photo

Developed by the Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies, University of Arkansas.