Stratigraphic Units

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Geologic
Organic

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2014-07-28 Andrew Johnston

These slabs represent the floor at the southern limit of Room 16, as well as serving as the covering for a drainage channel known to run east-west in this part of the terrace. It is uncertain what the transition to the rest of the space of Room 16 to the north would have looked like given the poor state of preservation. But these slabs do sit at a significantly higher level than the slab floor of the central-west part of that room (5662). Given the way in which the southernmost block of wall 5665 is worked, and the layer 5780 that was uncovered by the removal of SU 5572 inside of Room 16, it seems likely that there was originally an ashlar wall that ran E-W along these slabs (and slabs 5739), now robbed. Whether access would have been possible given the presence of this wall to spaces further north from these slabs is uncertain, as is the purpose of this space if it was a 'dead end', with only one route in across threshold 5596. Also unclear is the purpose of the ashlar block at the western limit of this floor (5586): is it the remnant of a proper wall that would have turned traffic immediately to the north upon entering this space from threshold 5596, or does it represent a different - and less obtrusive - kind of feature, whose purpose is now difficult to reconstruct?

2014-07-13 Giulia Peresso

Ashlar top surface of a drainage channel running E-W in F area.

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Faunal NISP

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

Connected Forms

Attachments

Attachments
SU5587_PHM714_extended.pdf
Photo Model

Threshold and walls of structure north of room 17

SU_5595_1.JPG
Photo

SU_5595_2.JPG
Photo

SU_5595_1.JPG
Photo

SU_5595_2.JPG
Photo