Stratigraphic Units

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Geologic
Organic

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2016-03-25 Andrew Johnston

Upon closer inspection during the offseason in the preparation of the preliminary report, it is highly likely this wall belongs to the first phase of the complex, and represents the westernmost stretch of the retaining wall that divided the lower terrace from the middle terrace. It is built directly upon bedrock. As the retaining wall proceeded westward, it took a slight jog northward from the line of the eastern portion of the wall (represented by blocks 5482 and 5487). This jog took place at the L-shaped N-S aligned ashlar block in the corner of Room 21 (SU 5909): this block represents a southern continuation of wall 5765, and the depression that has been carved into it is the standard width of an ashlar block (.45m) and was cut to accommodate a perpendicular E-W block.

2015-07-20 Nicholas Dell Isola

These ashlar blocks may be part of a wall from an earlier phase because they were cut into for the purpose of inserting other blocks using mortar. The blocks inserted into these ashlars may have served to support some type of bench or shelf. It is unlikely that the cuts were made when the ashlar blocks (5845) were constructed, as it would have been easier to use concrete for the wall rather than cutting into ashlars. The ashlar wall itself seems to have served to divide rooms 20 and 21.

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Faunal NISP

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

Connected Forms

Attachments

Attachments
PM1155_SU5842_SU5843_SU5844_SU5845_extended.pdf
Photo Model

Ashlar blocks and features. Parts of wall in Area F South

PM1298_SU5891_SU5889_SU5875_SU5890_SU5845_SU5133_extended.pdf
Photo Model

Drainage system and walls in F

GPR_5845_1.JPG
Photo

GPR_5845_2.JPG
Photo

GPR_5845_3.JPG
Photo

SU_5845_sketch.pdf
Sketch