Stratigraphic Units

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Geologic
Organic

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Relationships

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2018-07-19 Andrew Johnston

Wall built of regularly worked large tufo blocks, though of slightly different dimensions than typical ashlar walls of the mid-Republican period found in buildings elsewhere in the city (e.g. walls 7108/7204 to the south in Area H, or the walls of the Area F complex). Though later used as the foundation for a concrete wall (6056), it most likely belongs to an earlier phase. At the moment, without further excavation in the block to the east, it remains unclear whether its primary function was to delimit the side street or it belongs to some structure occupying the unexcavated portion of the block to the east (west of the Area I building). The construction technique is slightly unusual, with the upper course consisting mostly of headers laid on top of stretchers. That these headers (and the upper course generally) are less well preserved than the stretchers of the lower course may be the result either of their exposure to wear from the use of the road and general weathering, or because this wall actually consists of two phases: 1) the lowest course of stretchers, which is stepped gradually down the slope; and 2) the (possibly reused and poorly preserved) headers and stretchers of the upper course, added later (possibly shortly before or at the same time as the concrete wall 6056).

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Faunal NISP

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

Connected Forms

Attachments

Attachments
pm1991_su6056_su6068_su6069_su6070_ex.pdf
Photo Model

Concrete wall running north-south at eastern limit of Road 3, parallel to wall 6033; Concrete wall running east-west at northern limit of the Via Gabina, east of wall 6056; Wall in tufo blocks beneath wall 6068; Wall in tufo blocks beneath wall 6056.

GPR_6056_6068_6069_6070_7229_sketch.pdf
Sketch

Sketch of 6056, 6068, 6069, 6070, 7229.

SU6070(bottom_wall)_W_face.pdf
Photo Model

Cross Section with measurements of Walls SU 6070

SU_6070_1.JPG
Photo

View from north (placeholder). See also photos for 6056.