This large cut appears to have been associated with some kind of water feature that would have occupied the northeastern section of room G-10 and likely also within room G-9, based on water features in that space as well as the spoliation cut (6191) within wall 6181. It is also possible that the cut is the action of the SAR. In the east underneath wall 6181 we did not fully excavate the backfill out of fear of undercutting wall 6181.