Stratigraphic Units

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Basalt Slabs Medium
Tiles Frequent
Geologic
Basalt Rare
Travertine Medium
Tufo Medium grey
Tufo Rare red
Organic
Animal Bones Rare
Animal Teeth Rare
Shells Rare

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2017-07-23 Jason Farr

Excavation of the surrounding area - particularly the discovery of cut SU 8222 - has clarified the situation. SU 8117 is in fact the fill of this cut within our arbitrary trench, equal to SU 8146 to the west and 8143 to the east, both beyond the original limits of this trench. The purpose of the cut is unknown (spoliation?), but these fills probably accumulated as a combination of intentional dumping, gradual wall collapse, and natural colluvial deposition.

2017-06-30 Jason Farr

SU 8117 is likely the result of gradual collapse of nearby walls, as the rubble is most dense near the northern limit (su 8039 and su 8168). It was difficult to distinguish the limits between this SU and 8050 to the north, which has larger pieces of rubble and might once have constituted an intentional plugging of the doorway into Room I5 (if so it was highly disturbed or irregularly constructed).

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Bag # Cassetta # Recovery Method # of Specimens Weight (gr) Notes
3135 131 Excavation 0 273
Totals 0 273

Faunal NISP

Species NISP NISP % NISP Notes
0 0
Totals 0

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Class Count Weight (kg) Details
Bone 0.276
CBM 250.32 Weighed and discarded as of June 27 2017
Glass 19 0.113 vessel fragments: 5 bases (1 octopod), 3 rims (2 green), 11 walls
Iron 24 0.239 19 nails, including one nail 18cm in length
Marble 41 3.865 slab fragments: 31 white; 4 multicolored (red, brown, green, yellow, white); 4 white with blue veins; 1 pinkish-red with white inclusions; 1 red edge fragment
Mosaic Tile 3.52 2 small fragments of mosaic with tesserae imbedded in mortar (123g); 3.52kg of tesserae, both large and small sizes
Plaster 578 25.62 Majority of fragments belong to a wall scheme that includes white surface with orange-red stripes. These are worn and friable. 208 dfragments retain coloration on their surfaces. Other colors include deep red, green, orange and green stripes, yellow, red and pink, and black. 3 kg of white unfaced or highly crumbling fragments were returned to the spoil heap.
Totals 662 283.953
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

Stamp, stamped tile with lettering

Stamp, stamped tile, circle dot

Game Piece, Worked ceramic fragment

Bone Object, linear rectangular prism, worked bone -- antler

Stamp, stamped CBM

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics
Class Whole Vessels Rims Handles Bases Walls Total Weight (kg) Minimum Size (cm) Maximum Size (cm) Details
African Cookware 7 2 8 17 0.315 3 10 One rim sherd is African form but likely an imitation ware (yellow-gray fabric with reddish decorative "sooting" on the edge.
African Red Slip 4 14 18 0.177 2 8
Amphora 19 5 2 299 325 12.3 3 11
Black Gloss 2 3 5 0.021 2 5
Commonware 23 6 12 56 99 2.834 3 11 Includes several sherds that seem unusual, including a light-colored fabric with large quartz and other gritty inclusions.
Creamware 5 1 4 35 45 0.707 3 11
Dolium 1 1 2.571 11 11
Fineware 3 3 0.011 2 5
Impasto 1 1 3 5 0.395 4 11
Impasto Chiaro Sabbioso 1 1 2 0.023 4 4
Lamp 1 1 0.004 2 2
Large Storage Container 1 5 6 1.382 4 11
Painted Creamware 1 1 3 5 0.068 3 10
Terra Sigillata 2 2 4 0.006 1 2 1 wall sherd with molded egg and dart decoration, 1 rim sherd insufficiently preserved to see profile
Thin Walled 3 1 1 5 0.012 1 4
Unidentified Ceramic 2 2 0.014 3 4 Micaceous water jug (Late Roman eastern amphora type, according to Iacomelli).
Totals 0 70 14 22 435 543 20.84

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

360 AD - 470 AD

230 AD - 360 AD

Connected Forms

Attachments

Attachments
SU_8117_1.JPG
Photo

Layer of rubble and soil south of room I5

SU_8117_2.JPG
Photo

Layer of rubble and soil south of room I5

SU_8117_3.JPG
Photo

Layer of rubble and soil south of room I5

GPR_8117_8146_8143_sketch.pdf
Sketch

Layer of rubble and soil south of room I5; Rubble and soil deposit W of 8117; Rubbly deposit east of SU 8117