Stratigraphic Units

Prev Next

Publication

Publication Status
Publication Year
Publication Notes

Basics

Excavation Year
Area
Definition
Formation Process
Stratigraphical Reliability
SU Type
Layer Distinguished By
Photos
Photo Model

Record Events

Filled Out By
Revised By
Finds Studied By
Filled Out On
Revised On
Finds Processed On
SU Closed

Inclusions

Class Frequency Details
Anthropic
Pottery Frequent
Geologic
Tufo Frequent Grey
Organic
Animal Bones Medium
Animal Teeth Rare

Soil Matrix

Composition
Clay %
Silt %
Sand %
Matrix
Compaction
Measured Compaction
Measured Compaction (kg per cm)
Color

Unit Limits

Northern Limit
Southern Limit
Western Limit
Eastern Limit
Depth Limit
Unit Limit Notes

Stratigraphic Sequence

Relationships

Observations and Descriptions

Observations
Position
Shape

Layers

Surface
Inclusion Observations
Thickness Observations
Interface

Cuts

Cut Edges
Cut Sides
Cut Bottom
Cut Top Edge
Cut Bottom Edge
Cut Observations

Structural Remains

Alignment
Building Technique

Binding Agent
Mortar Description
Mortar Inclusions

Mortar Inclusion Size
Wall Facing

Foundations
Floor Type

Wall Finishing

Dimensions
Structure Description

Samples

Total Volume of Layer (buckets)
Soil Sampling
Soil Sample Quantity (buckets)
Soil Sample Fraction (%)
Sieving
Sieving Sample Quantity (buckets)
Sieving Sample Fraction (%)
Non Soil Sampling
Non Soil Sample Type
Non Soil Sample Size

Interpretations

Interpretations
2020-06-16 BrittanyProffitt

During post-excavation study, this feature was reinterpreted as either an abandonment deposit or leveling deposit sitting between the Phase 1B and 2 buildings. Because of the compressed stratigraphy between the two phases, it is not possible to isolate a single function for this deposit.

2015-07-27 Dylan Davis

The deposit is related to either a leveling surface for the construction of a floor preparation, or the destruction levels of an earlier surface.

Dates and Phasing

Approximate Date of Layer
to
Date of Layer Observations
Creation Phase (First Phase Present)
Last Active Phase (Present and in Use)
Last Presence Phase (Last Phase Present, not in Use)

Faunal Register

Bag # Cassetta # Recovery Method # of Specimens Weight (gr) Notes
1673 112 0 86
1755 119 0 15
Totals 0 101

Faunal NISP

Species NISP NISP % NISP Notes
0 0
0 0
Totals 0

Bulk Finds

Finds Observations
Finds Storage Notes
Bulk Finds
Class Count Weight (kg) Details
Bone 0.089
Totals 0 0.089
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Fire Damage Notes

Special Finds

1585
Bone Object, Worked bone fragment

Ceramics

Ceramics Assemblage Condition
Lost / Damaged - Shed Fire 2020
Ceramics Condition Comments
Ceramics
Class Whole Vessels Rims Handles Bases Walls Total Weight (kg) Minimum Size (cm) Maximum Size (cm) Details
Bucchero 2 2 0.016 2 5
CBM 0.847
Commonware 3 2 20 25 0.309 2 10
Fineware 1 1 2 0.007 3 3
Impasto 4 4 0.02 2 3
Impasto Chiaro Sabbioso 2 2 0.012 3 4
Impasto Rosso 2 2 0.015 2 3
Internal Slip Ware 1 4 5 0.04 2 5
Opaque Red Ware 1 1 2 0.023 3 7 Slip is particularly rich or dark color, very smooth.
Overpainted Black Gloss 1 3 4 0.033 2 6
Painted Fineware 1 1 0.005 4 4
Totals 0 4 1 4 40 49 1.327

Glass

Glass

Spot Dates

3867
675 BC - 450 BC

3868
425 BC - 250 BC

3869
500 BC - 400 BC

3870
400 BC - 200 BC

Connected Forms

Botany
632

Attachments

Attachments
PM1198_SU2457_extended.pdf
Photo Model

Linear deposit of loose brown soil W. of 2434

GPR_2457.JPG
Photo

SU_2457_sketch.pdf
Sketch

Developed by the Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies, University of Arkansas.